Legal Opinion
Ward v. Northern Ohio Telephone Company
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided March 21, 1966No. Civ. 8553PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
YOUNG, District Judge.
Defendant has moved for summary judgment on the grounds that the statutory limitation period has elapsed and that plaintiff is not the real party in interest.
At the commencement of this suit plaintiff was the operator and licensee of a radio station serving the vicinity of Bowling Green, Ohio. Defendant telephone company provides service to northwest Ohio, including the Bowling Green area. The complaint sets forth eight causes of action, all of which arise out of defendant’s alleged refusal or failure to give telephone and wire service to plaintiff. No claim is made for…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Shapiro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- United States v. MoniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Hecht v. MalleySupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Association of Westinghouse Salaried Employees v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
- Sharon Margaret Pavlak, Cross-Appellee v. John R. Church, Individually and in His Capacity as Chief of Police for the City of Boise, Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. RuckerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Nordlicht v. New York Telephone Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- MFS International, Inc. v. International Telcom Ltd.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.