Potts v. Henderson
Indiana Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Franklin Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
Covenant on a sealed agreement, whereby the appellees bound themselves to build the superstructure of a bridge, and the appellants, describing themselves as “ commissioners appointed to superintend the building of a bridge across the west fork of White Water at Laurel,” agreed to pay the appellees therefor. It is averred ill the declaration that the appellees had fully performed their obligations under the contract, but that the appellants had refused to make the payments therein specified.
The appellants filed two pleas, averring, in substance, that the appellants were appointed by the board…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Campbell v. BrackenridgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1847
- Archer v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1834
- M'Henry v. DuffieldIndiana Supreme Court · 1844
3Cited by13 opinions
- Union School Township v. National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Board of Commissioners v. AllmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
- Jackson School Township v. FarlowIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- State ex rel. Scott v. HartIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
- Newman v. SylvesterIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.