Must v. Wilkinson
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
HALL, District Judge.
The sole question is whether or not this court has jurisdiction in this action for declaratory relief, 28 U.S.C.A. § 2201, involving a dispute between an alleged infringer as plaintiff and an applicant for a patent as defendant.
While suits for declaratory relief by an alleged infringer against a holder of a patent are common, counsel have failed to cite, and independent research has failed to find, any case wherein jurisdiction is attempted to be justified in a suit by an alleged infringer against an applicant for a patent before the issuance of the patent.
The complaint…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Gayler v. WilderSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
- Marsh v. Nichols, Shepard & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Southern Pac. Co. v. McAdooCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
- E. W. Bliss Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Atlantic Meat Co. v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1948
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Pittway Corp. v. BRK Shareholders' CommitteeDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1978