Legal Opinion

Must v. Wilkinson

District Court, S.D. California

Decided January 20, 1955No. 17260PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, District Judge.

The sole question is whether or not this court has jurisdiction in this action for declaratory relief, 28 U.S.C.A. § 2201, involving a dispute between an alleged infringer as plaintiff and an applicant for a patent as defendant.

While suits for declaratory relief by an alleged infringer against a holder of a patent are common, counsel have failed to cite, and independent research has failed to find, any case wherein jurisdiction is attempted to be justified in a suit by an alleged infringer against an applicant for a patent before the issuance of the patent.

The complaint…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gayler v. WilderSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
  2. Marsh v. Nichols, Shepard & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. Southern Pac. Co. v. McAdooCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
  4. E. W. Bliss Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  5. Atlantic Meat Co. v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1948

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pittway Corp. v. BRK Shareholders' CommitteeDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API