Legal Opinion
Chapman Law Firm Co. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided May 10, 2005No. 04-1418CPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MEROW, Senior Judge.
The Opinion, in this matter, reported at 62 Fed.Cl. 464 (2004), declared Housing and Urban Development’s (“HUD”) decision to override a stay of contract performance to be invalid. This stay occurred, under 31 U.S.C. § 3553(d)(3)(A)(ii), upon Chapman Law Firm’s (“Chapman”) protest to the General Accountability Office (“GAO”) concerning the award of a Management and Marketing (“M & M”) contract by HUD to another contractor also submitting a proposal.
Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412, Chapman seeks recovery of the fees and other…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Scarborough v. PrincipiSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Pgba, LLC v. United States, and Wisconsin Physicians Service Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Charles W. Bazalo, Claimant-Appellant v. Togo D. West, Jr., Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Select Milk Producers, Inc. v. JohannsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Reilly's Wholesale Produce v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Supreme Foodservice Gmbh v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Advanced Systems Development, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- PMTech, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Greenleaf Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.