Legal Opinion

Fistel v. Christman

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 27, 1952No. Civ. Acts No. 9178PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARSH, District Judge.

Plaintiff brought this suit under the provisions of Sections 16(b) and 27 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S. C.A. §§ 78p(b) and 78aa, and other relevant sections.

The complaint alleges that between June 8, 1948, and November 1, 1948, a period of less than six months, the individual defendant purchased 21,088 shares, more or less, of Follansbee Steel Corporation common stock and sold 5,200 shares, more or less, realizing profits thereon, which did not inure to and were not recovered by the issuing corporation.

The defendant Christman, hereinafter called…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pennsylvania Co. for Insurances on Lives & Granting Annuities v. DeckertCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Carr-Consolidated Biscuit Co. v. MooreDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1954
  2. Biby v. SmithSuperior Court of Delaware · 1970
  3. United States ex rel. Graybar Electric Co. v. MacKenzie-Foster Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1962
  4. United States v. GreitzerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1955
  5. Carr-Consolidated Biscuit Company v. MooreDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1954

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API