Legal Opinion
United States v. Greitzer
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided October 28, 1955No. Civ. A. 18267PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VAN DUSEN, District Judge.
This case is before the court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment under Rule 56, 28 U.S.C. This action was brought by the United States to recover from this defendant and three other defendants, whose cases are not now under consideration, for alleged violations of the Surplus Property Act of 1944.1
In accordance with my opinion of October 25, 1955, in United States v. Covollo, D.C., 136 F.Supp. 107, I hold that the statute of limitations did not run on this cause of action until December 31, 1954. The initial complaint in this case was filed on December 29,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bomar v. KeyesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
- Hackner v. Guaranty Trust Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
- John Walker & Sons, Limited v. Tampa Cigar Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
- Bovaird & Seyfang Manufacturing Co. v. FergusonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
- Gibson v. Pittsburgh Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. WelchDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957
- Prudential Lines, Inc. v. Marine Repair Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1982
- Abelino ARCHULETA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DUFFY’S INC., Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1973
- Abelino ARCHULETA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DUFFY’S INC., Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1973
- McMorrow v. Mondelez International, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2021