Pittsburgh, C., C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. Daniels
Appellate Court of Illinois
Action in Case.—Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Axel Chytraus, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1899.
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Presiding Justice Adams
delivered the opinion of the court.
By the declaration the pleader seems to rely on two causes of action : the alleged refusal or neglect of the ticket agent to give appellee an exchange ticket in accordance with provision 2 of the contract, and the expulsion of appellee from, the train by the conductor. Can the appellee recover damages on account of being compelled by the conductor to leave the train ? One of the rules of the company, which is also a part of appellee’s contract, is that a mileage ticket, such as that in question, will not be honored on a train or in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Frederick v. Marquette, Houghton & Ontonagon RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy R. R. v. GriffinIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. ConnellIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
- Pullman Palace Car Co. v. ReedIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
- Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. BannermanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1884
3Cited by1 opinion
- St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909