Legal Opinion

Acosta v. State of Oregon

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided November 30, 2021No. 3:21-cv-01343Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON THOMAS P. ACOSTA, Case No. 3:21-cv-01343-IM Plaintiff, ORDER OF DISMISSAL v. STATE OF OREGON; THOMAS O. BRANDFORD, Judge for Newport OR; MARCIA BUCKLEY, Judge; GUY GRACO, Attorney; ALICA VACHSS, Defendants. IMMERGUT, District Judge. Plaintiff Thomas P. Acosta (“Acosta”), a self-represented litigant, filed this lawsuit on September 13, 2021. ECF 2. This Court previously granted Acosta leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). ECF 6. This Court also, however, dismissed Acosta’s Complaint, ECF 2, for failure to state a claim. ECF…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API