Legal Opinion

Eoff v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 14, 1914No. 3211PublishedCited by 5 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

HARPER, Judge.

—Appellant was prosecuted and convicted of perjury, and his punishment assessed at two years confinement in the State penitentiary.

J. M. Baldwin was attorney for appellant on the trial of this cause. The record discloses that an agreement between counsel for the State and defendant was introduced in evidence on the trial of the case, appellant being present at the time. The facts agreed to were material and necessary to be proven on the trial of the case. After conviction appellant employed additional counsel, and they in the motion for new trial complain that the court erred in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bailey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1899
  2. Barnes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1918
  2. Landers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1919
  3. Lewallen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1930
  4. Mullenex v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
  5. Mullenex v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API