Bailey v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
On motion of the Assistant Attorney-General the hills of exception and statement of facts were stricken from the record because filed after adjournment of the term of the trial court. Ho further statement necessary.
1Opinion of the Court
DAVID SOU, Presiding Judge.
Appellant was convicted of perjury, and his punishment assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for a term of two years.
The statement of facts and bills of exception áre shown by the affidavit of appellant’s counsel to have been filed subsequent to the adjournment of court, although the file mark on the bills of exception shows the same to have been filed in the day court adjourned. We are not authorized to consider bills, even when filed back in term time, if in fact they were filed subsequent to the adjournment of the court. Spencer v. State, 34 Texas Crim.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Spencer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1895
3Cited by7 opinions
- Roberts v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
- Eoff v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1914
- Hambright v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1905
- Barnes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
- Guile v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.