Legal Opinion

Boatright v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 6, 1923No. 14049PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.

1. “ It is a well established rule of practice that a ground of a motion for new trial based upon the admission of evi-' dence should state the objection made to the evidence, and that such objection was urged at the time the objection was made; otherwise no question is raised for determination. Hill v. Chastain, 138 Ga. 750 (75 S. E. 1130); Dunn v. Evans, 139 Ga. 741 (3), 742 (78 S. E. 122); Chambers v. State, 141 Ga. 652 (81 S. E. 880); G. & E. Ry. Co. v. Stapleton, 143 Ga. 46 (84 S. E. 120.)” City of Rome v. McWilliams, 145 Ga. 191 (2) (88 S. E. 931). This ruling disposes of the special…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dunn v. EvansSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  2. Hill v. ChastainSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  3. City of Rome v. McWilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  4. Coffee v. DunaganSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
  5. Georgia & Florida Railway Co. v. StapletonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Owens v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  2. Gray v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API