Legal Opinion

Henson v. Barnhart

District Court, E.D. Texas

Decided April 29, 2005No. 1:03 CV 862PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER OVERRULING PLAINIFF’S OBJECTIONS AND ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CRONE, District Judge.

This appeal from an adverse administrative decision of the Commissioner of Social Security Administration was referred to the Honorable Earl S. Hines, United States Magistrate Judge, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. The magistrate judge recommends that the court affirm the Commissioner’s decision. Plaintiff filed timely objections which require de novo review. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b).

Plaintiffs indistinct objections argue…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Donna J. Clifford v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  5. Daniel P. Cotter v. Patricia Roberts Harris, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Prince v. BarnhartDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2005
  2. Freeney v. Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2022
  3. Lambert v. Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API