Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Ex parte Limbaugh

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided November 25, 1969No. 3 Div. 33Published

1ConcurrenceCates, Judge

(concurring specially) :

This is an original mandamus action to activate the District Attorney of the 15th Judicial Circuit into seeking a writ of habeas corpus ad prosequendum. If issued, the petitioner would be delivered by the agents of the Attorney General of the United States to the Circuit Court of Montgomery County for trial.

As I understand the governing regulations for “lending” a Federal prisoner to a State for trial, the State must agree to pay the cost and to return the prisoner to the designated United States marshal. See Smith v. Hooey, 393 U.S. 374, 89 S.Ct. 575, 21 L.Ed.2d 607,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Klopfer v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Smith v. HooeySupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Robert E. Greene v. Michigan Department of CorporationsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1963
  4. White v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1901
  5. In Re ColinMichigan Supreme Court · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API