Legal Opinion
Davidson v. Long Beach Pleasure Pier Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 12, 1950No. Civ. 17399PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDrapeau, J.
Three teen-age girls, plaintiff, her sister, and their friend from Utah, were enjoying one of the Christmas holidays on the strand at Long Beach. They rode on a roller coaster. They went into the House of the Laughing Lady. And then two of them, the plaintiff and the girl from Utah, got tangled up with an amusement device called a tilt-a-whirl.
The tilt-a-whirl was located on an ocean pier belonging to defendant Long Beach Pleasure Pier Company; it was owned by defendant E. C. Velare; and, at the time the girls rode on it, it was operated by the defendant Carmen Tomei. Long Beach Pleasure Pier…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ybarra v. SpangardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Peterson v. LoganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Gavin v. Protestant Episcopal BishopCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Ales v. RyanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Shannon v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hook v. Lakeside Park CompanySupreme Court of Colorado · 1960
- McDaniel v. DowellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Watson v. McEwenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Sergermeister v. Recreation Corp. of America, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
- Neubauer v. Disneyland, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.