Legal Opinion

Lowenberg v. City of Dallas

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 2008No. 06-0310PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Per curiam

During the first nine months of 1995, the City of Dallas charged a fee on commercial buildings to generate funds for fire protection services. Failure to pay the fee carried a criminal fine of up to $2,000. Threatened with that penalty, petitioner Jim Lowenberg paid his fee of $80 and then sued for a refund for himself as well as all others who paid the fee, alleging that the fee was an unlawful occupation tax. The trial court certified a class and granted the class’s motion for summary judgment. The court of appeals reversed, holding that as a matter of law, the fee was an unlawful tax but…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hurt v. CooperTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Dallas County Community College District v. BoltonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Gates v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  4. William Hoefling & Son v. City of San AntonioTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Lowenberg v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. MBM Financial Corp. v. Woodlands Operating Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2009
  2. City of Dallas v. Woodfield, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2010
  3. Nelson v. City of Dallas, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2009
  4. Gatesco Q.M. Ltd. v. City of HoustonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
  5. Hunt v. City of DibollCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API