Fruger v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
RAMSEY, Judge.
Appellant appeals from a conviction had in the District Court of Polk County wherein he was charged with the crime of theft of property over the value of $50.
The conviction must be reversed on account of the charge of the court in respect to accomplice’s testimony. One Buck Markentell testified in the case to circumstances connecting appellant with the crime. Without his testimony the State could have made but a slight showing against appellant. On the subject of accomplice’s testimony the court instructed the jury as follows: “How, you can not convict the defendant upon his…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Bell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898
- Faulkner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1901
- Barrett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909
- Crenshaw v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1905
- Oates v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1905
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Grant v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
- Wadkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
- Goodwin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1930
- Snelling v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909
- Campbell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.