Leroux v. Bank of New Hampshire, N.A.
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtThayer, J.
The plaintiffs appeal a denial of their petition for declaratory judgment, claiming that the Superior Court {Murphy, J.) erred in holding that RSA 479:3 (Supp. 1988) does not bar a foreclosing priority mortgagee from recovering its accrued interest, late charges, and foreclosure costs from the foreclosure proceeds, if these items, when added to the principal amount due, result in a sum that exceeds the principal amount appearing on the face of the mortgage to the detriment of junior lienholders. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the denial of the plaintiffs’ petition.
The parties…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wood v. WeimarSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Peterson v. John J. Reilly, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1964
- Voorhis v. WesterveltSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1887
- New-Hampshire Bank v. WillardSuperior Court of New Hampshire · 1839
- Peaslee v. EvansSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1926
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Sabato v. Fed. Nat'l Mortg. Ass'nSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2019
- Wayne Sabato v. Federal National Mortgage AssociationSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2019