Legal Opinion

Thickstun v. Howard

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1847PublishedCited by 8 opinions

ERROR to the Sullivan Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Action on the case. The declaration avers that on the 20th of November, 1844, at said county of Sullivan, the defendant was a common innkeeper and that the plaintiff was lodged in the inn of the defendant; that the plaintiff was then and there possessed of a certain gray horse of the value of 40 dollars, which said horse was delivered to the said defendant to be kept for hire; and that said horse, for want of safe-keeping and by reason of the negligence of the said defendant, was killed at the defendant’s inn; wherefore the plaintiff had sustained damage, &c. The trial in the Circuit Court…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Piper v. MannyNew York Supreme Court · 1839
  2. Sneider v. GeissSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1791
  3. Hill v. OwenIndiana Supreme Court · 1840

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hulett v. . SwiftNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
  2. Pinkerton v. WoodwardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  3. McDaniels v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1854
  4. Hays v. TurnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1867
  5. Ingallsbee v. . WoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1865

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API