Legal Opinion

Cauchon v. Gladstone

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 4, 1932PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSlack, J.

The claimant seeks ■ to recover compensation under the provisions of the Workmen's Compensation Act, hereafter referred to as‘the Act, for injuries sustained by him while in defendant’s employ, to wit: On October 1, 1929. His right to recover is challenged on the sole ground that at the time he was injured the defendant did not regularly employ more than ten employees.

The main question for review is raised by the exception to a directed verdict for the defendant at the close of claimant’s evidence.

Section 5768 of the General Laws provides that the Act shall not apply'to “employers who…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mobile Liners, Inc. v. McConnellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  2. Kelley's Dependents v. Hoosac Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1921
  3. State v. ClementsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  4. Wlock v. Fort Dummer MillsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1925
  5. Lacroix v. FrechetteSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1929

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Birmingham Post Co. v. SturgeonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  2. Simon Seeding & Sod, Inc. v. Dubuque Human Rights Commission and Jermaine StapletonSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
  3. Marshall v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1945
  4. France v. MunsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
  5. Amended August 2, 2017 Simon Seeding & Sod, Inc. v. Dubuque Human Rights Commission and Jermaine StapletonSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API