Legal Opinion

Phillips v. Phillips

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 4, 1986No. 8610DC439PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Judge.

Defendant first argues that the trial court erred in determining that the plaintiff was a dependent spouse and accordingly that the award of alimony is invalid. We disagree.

G.S. 50-16.1(3) defines a “dependent spouse” as one who is either (1) actually substantially dependent on the other spouse for his or her maintenance and support or (2) substantially in need of that maintenance and support. In Williams v. Williams, 299 N.C. 174, 261 S.E. 2d 849 (1980), our Supreme Court discussed that definition. There, the Court held that a spouse is “actually substantially dependent” if…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Quick v. QuickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lamb v. LambCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  2. Ellinwood v. EllinwoodCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  3. Haythe v. HaytheCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2024
  4. Lamb v. LambCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  5. Latak v. LatakCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API