Phillips v. Phillips
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EAGLES, Judge.
Defendant first argues that the trial court erred in determining that the plaintiff was a dependent spouse and accordingly that the award of alimony is invalid. We disagree.
G.S. 50-16.1(3) defines a “dependent spouse” as one who is either (1) actually substantially dependent on the other spouse for his or her maintenance and support or (2) substantially in need of that maintenance and support. In Williams v. Williams, 299 N.C. 174, 261 S.E. 2d 849 (1980), our Supreme Court discussed that definition. There, the Court held that a spouse is “actually substantially dependent” if…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Quick v. QuickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lamb v. LambCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
- Ellinwood v. EllinwoodCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
- Haythe v. HaytheCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2024
- Lamb v. LambCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
- Latak v. LatakCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014