Stokes v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
HERRMANN, Chief Justice:
In this appeal from his convictions for First Degree Murder, First Degree Robbery, First Degree Conspiracy, and two counts of Possession of a Deadly Weapon during the Commission of a Felony, the defendant, Walter Stokes, Jr., raises three issues: (1) that the State’s failure to disclose exculpatory statements in a timely manner violated his right to due process of law under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963); (2) that the prosecutor’s question to a police witness regarding a co-defendant’s statement to the police, and the State’s…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Moore v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Riley v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1985
- Deberry v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1983
- Lilly v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1994
- DeJesus v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1995
- Michael v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1987
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.