Legal Opinion

Stokes v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided May 9, 1979PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HERRMANN, Chief Justice:

In this appeal from his convictions for First Degree Murder, First Degree Robbery, First Degree Conspiracy, and two counts of Possession of a Deadly Weapon during the Commission of a Felony, the defendant, Walter Stokes, Jr., raises three issues: (1) that the State’s failure to disclose exculpatory statements in a timely manner violated his right to due process of law under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963); (2) that the prosecutor’s question to a police witness regarding a co-defendant’s statement to the police, and the State’s…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Moore v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Riley v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1985
  2. Deberry v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1983
  3. Lilly v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1994
  4. DeJesus v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1995
  5. Michael v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1987

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API