Legal Opinion

Brown v. Brown

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 16, 1993No. 9218DC1343PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Chief Judge.

In his first assignment of error, Mr. Brown contends the district court erred in making findings of fact which were “irrelevant and without substantial evidence in the record to support them.” We disagree. Pursuant to Rule 11, the signer makes three certifications. *617They are that the pleading is (1) well grounded in fact, (2) warranted by existing law, and (3) not interposed for an improper purpose. Bryson v. Sullivan, 330 N.C. 644, 412 S.E.2d 327 (1992). In Turner v. Duke University, our Supreme Court set the applicable standard for appellate review of the granting or…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Turner v. Duke UniversitySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  2. Bryson v. SullivanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  3. Central Carolina Nissan, Inc. v. SturgisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Albrecht v. DorsettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  2. Taylor v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API