Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Goldberg

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 13, 1937No. Appeals, 297-302PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion bt

Rhodes, J.,

Appellants, Thomas J. Goldberg and Harry S. Hurock, together with three others, were convicted of (1) obtaining money by false pretenses; (2) conspiracy to cheat and defraud; and (3) soliciting contributions for charitable purposes without authorization, etc. Each of the appellants received a sentence of two years in the county prison on the charge of obtaining money by false pretenses. On the other charges sentence was suspended as to both appellants.

Appellants’ principal contention on this appeal is that the evidence ivas insufficient to convict them on the three…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. TrunkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Com. v. Benz., Com. v. RoutleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  3. Commonwealth v. ByersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
  4. Commonwealth of Pa. v. KolskySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  5. Commonwealth v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BurdellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  2. Commonwealth v. GrossSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  3. Commonwealth v. FeldmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Commonwealth v. ThomasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  5. Commonwealth v. KelsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API