Legal Opinion

Miller v. Miller

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided June 27, 1984No. File FA7-475PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoti, J.

This is a civil action to determine the paternity of the named plaintiffs child. A hearing in limine was conducted in advance of trial on the state’s motion to allow it to introduce, for the purpose of establishing the probability of paternity, the results of human leukocyte antigen tests (hereinafter HLA) and related tests.

HLA testing is based on tissue typing of the white blood cells, wherein those cells are tested against different reagents to establish genetic markers which then may form a correlation between the mother and the child and between the child and the putative father. Since a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  2. United States v. Isiah Williams and Michael ManningCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
  3. Cutchember v. PayneDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Everett v. EverettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  5. Pizana v. JonesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Moore v. McNamaraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  2. Commonwealth v. BeausoleilMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  3. Miller v. KirshnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  4. Commonwealth v. BeausoleilMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API