Volk v. DeMeerleer
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
*394¶1 We undertake the humbling and daunting task of demarcating the duty a mental health professional owed to third parties to protect them from the violent behavior of the professional’s outpatient client. The parties, the mental health care profession, and the residents of Washington State would be better served by the legislature addressing this question after a comprehensive review of scientific data and statistics and after a thorough airing of the competing interests and policies involved. Since we conclude that the state legislature has not addressed the duty owed in the context of an…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Tarasoff v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. RussellWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- Matter of Personal Restraint of YoungWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- Thompson v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Seven Gables Corp. v. MGM/UA Entertainment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Volk v. DeMeerleerWashington Supreme Court · 2016
- Joshua Driggs v. Andrew T.G. Howlett, M.D., et uxCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
- Kathie and Joe Boyer v. Kai Morimoto, MD and Plastic Surgery NorthwestCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- Robert & Patricia Ruhl, Resps v. Project Corps, Llc, Apps.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2016
- Volk v. DeMeerleerWashington Supreme Court · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.