Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Hunt v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided October 10, 1979No. F-76-821Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBrett, Judge

I concur that the sentence in this conviction should be modified. However, I dissent to the treatment of this conviction as a felony for the reason I believe that it should have been prosecuted as a misdemeanor.

Notwithstanding what the United States Supreme Court held in United States v. Batchelder, supra, while interpreting the Federal statutes and procedure, I believe that the action of the Oklahoma legislature, in passing the misdemeanor statute 21 O.S. 1971, § 1040.8, which became effective March 27, 1979, repealed by implication the provisions of 21 O.S.1971, § 1040.51, the felony…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. CALVARESTSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975
  2. In RE OLSEN v. DelmoreWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  3. State of Oregon v. PirkeyOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  4. State v. BlancheyWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Atchley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API