De Klotz v. Hyers

Rehearing of In re De Klotz, ante, p. 140. This case was submitted with In re Arrigo, ante, p. 134, and In re Indovina, ante, p. 140, and in the former opinion it was stated that the disposition of the case was controlled *862by the Arrigo case. In that case it was held that the legislature had power to provide that a package of food products in which a gift or prize was placed should be deemed to be misbranded. Our attention now being called specially to the evidence, it is believed that there is a distinction betAveen the facts in the cases mentioned and those in this case. In the case at bar…