Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Hartigan v. Sperry & Hutchinson Co.
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided December 24, 1913No. 18,058PublishedCited by 12 opinions
Appeal from the district court for Adams county: Harry S. Dungan, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtFawcett, J.
The relator, the county attorney for Adams county, instituted proceedings in quo warranto in the district court for .that county, to oust the respondent from the state of Nebraska, and from a judgment of ouster the respondent appeals.
The pleadings, consisting of the amended information, the answer and reply, are voluminous a.nd will not be set out. A reference to the real points in issue will be sufficient. The judgment of ouster was based solely on the fol-' lowing findings:
“The court further finds that on August 25, 1911, after *787the respondent had been doing business in the state of Nebraska…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Young v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1903
- O'Keeffe v. City of SomervilleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
- Commonwealth v. SissonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
- Humes v. City of Ft. SmithU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Arkansas · 1899
- Commonwealth v. EmersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Nelsen v. TilleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1939
- People v. VictorMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
- State ex rel. English v. RubackNebraska Supreme Court · 1938
- State v. HoltgreveUtah Supreme Court · 1921
- Steffey v. City of CasperWyoming Supreme Court · 1961
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.