Legal Opinion

Letts v. Letts

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1892PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error to Wayne. (Brevoort, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error. Thefaots are stated in the opinion, and in 73 Mich. 138.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

This case has once been before the Court, and is found reported in 73 Mich. 138. On the •second trial the plaintiff gave evidence tending to show that she received the note in question as her share of her father’s estate; that it had never been paid; and further testified that, in the spring or summer of 1881, the •defendant came into the house- one morning, and demanded the note. She could not then find it, but •within a few days she did. She testified further:

I don’t remember how many days, — two or three. I ■came in one morningj and said, ‘ I have found the note; ’ and he says, I want to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Letts v. LettsMichigan Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hill v. Harbor Steel & Supply Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Lock v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Labarge v. Pere Marquette RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  4. People v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  5. People v. SnyderMichigan Supreme Court · 1913

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API