Legal Opinion
United States v. Martin
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided November 30, 2011No. 10-5301, 10-5304, 10-5306PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by published opinion. Judge DUNCAN wrote the opinion, in which Judge MOTZ joined. Judge GREGORY wrote an opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part.
OPINION
DUNCAN, Circuit Judge:
A jury convicted Paulette Martin, Learley Goodwin, Derrek Bynum, and Lavon Dobie (collectively “Appellants”) of various drug related offenses. As part of their sentences, the district court ordered Appellants to forfeit assets connected to their drug crimes pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 853.1 On appeal, Appellants seek vacature of the district court’s orders of forfeiture.2 For the reasons that follow, we…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bowles v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Herring v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Lopez-MendozaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Eberhart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Libretti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- United States v. Donald WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Gerald BoutcherCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021
- United States v. Andracos MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. OregonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Shannon WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.