Legal Opinion

Board of Regents, The University of Texas System v. Boston Scientific Corporation

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided January 20, 2023No. 1:18-cv-00392Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE BOARD OF REGENTS, THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SYSTEM and TISSUEGEN, Inc. Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 18-392-GBW v. BOSTON SCIENTIFIC Corp. Defendant. MEMORANDUM ORDER Plaintiffs Board of Regents, The University of Texas System’s (““UTBOR”) and TissueGen, Inc.’s (“TissueGen”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) First Amended Complaint alleges that Defendant Boston Scientific Corp. (“BSC”) directly, indirectly, and willfully infringed, via its “Synergy” brand coronary stents (the “Accused Products”),

U.S. Patent No. 6,596,296

(“the ’296…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Susan M. Maxwell v. J. Baker, Inc., and Prange Way, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
  2. Arctic Cat Inc. v. Bombardier Recreational Products Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
  3. Funai Electric Co., Ltd. v. Daewoo Electronics Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
  4. Minks v. Polaris Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
  5. Arctic Cat Inc. v. Bombardier RecreationalCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API