Legal Opinion

Pratt v. Township Board of Highway Commissioners

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 9, 1942No. 35,530PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*443The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J.:

This was a mandamus action wherein the plaintiff asked that the defendant board be ordered to repair and improve three miles of road. Judgment was for the plaintiff. Defendants appeal.

An alternative writ was issued by the trial court. This writ set out the residence and official character of the parties, the location of the three miles of road in question, and that it was the duty of the defendant officers to procure tools and materials for the construction of the highway in question; that it had been made to appear that this highway was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bohan v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930
  2. Breedlove v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
  3. Kansas National Bank v. HoveySupreme Court of Kansas · 1892
  4. Fall River Township v. PrattSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
  5. Wilson v. WinfreySupreme Court of Kansas · 1905

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fidelity Life Ass'n v. HobbsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1946
  2. Board of County Commissioners v. Lincoln TownshipSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API