Legal Opinion

Bird v. Louer

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 11, 1933No. Gen. No. 36,587PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Matchett

delivered the opinion of the court.

In an action on the ease, upon trial by the court without a jury, there was a finding for defendant and judgment thereon which plaintiff as administrator seeks to reverse by this appeal.

The amended declaration was in eight counts, plaintiff relying, however, upon only the first and the fifth. The first averred in substance that defendant was the owner of and he and his agents, servants and employees operated and used a certain aeroplane in carrying passengers from one airport or landing field into the air and returning to the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Densby v. BartlettIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Newell v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1914
  3. McCusker v. Curtiss Wright Flying Service, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1933
  4. Collins v. McMullinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1922
  5. Meyer v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bruce v. O'Neal Flying Service, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  2. Drahmann's Administratrix v. Brink's AdministratrixCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1956
  3. Mitchell v. EyreNebraska Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Hillend v. Koltsch and FrinkOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Bruce v. O'Neal Flying Service, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1949

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API