Legal Opinion

Meyer v. Industrial Commission

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1931No. 20957. Reversed and remandedPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Stone

This cause is here on writ of error allowed by this court to review the decision of the circuit court of Cook county holding that plaintiff in error is not entitled to compensation for the death of her husband, Walter W. Meyer. The circuit court confirmed the holding of the Industrial Commission setting aside an award granted by the arbitrator.

The facts are not in dispute. The usual business and occupation of defendant in error, Albert E. M. Louer, on the day of the death of Meyer, was that of inventory merchandise manager for Mandel Bros, store, in the city of Chicago. He purchased an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Decatur Railway & Light Co. v. Industrial BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Franklin Coal & Coke Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Densby v. BartlettIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
  4. VanWatermeullen v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Cinofsky v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Claude Wardle, Sr. v. Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension FundCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
  2. Gundich v. Emerson-Comstock Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Lawrence v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Village of Creve Coeur v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. PixlerSupreme Court of Florida · 1939

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API