Legal Opinion

Teck Metals, Ltd. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's

District Court, E.D. Washington

Decided October 22, 2010No. CV-05-411-LRSPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER RE MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT RE QUALIFIED POLLUTION EXCLUSION CLAUSE

LONNY R. SUKO, Chief Judge.

BEFORE THE COURT are Plaintiffs and Defendants’ Cross-Motions For Summary Judgment Re The Qualified Pollution Exclusion Clause (Ct. Rec. 382 and 424). These motions were heard with oral argument on July 22. David F. Klein, Esq., argued for the Plaintiff. Gabriel Baker, Esq., argued for Defendants.

I. BACKGROUND

This motion presents the same threshold issues which have been addressed in the court’s “Order Re Motions For Summary Judgment Re Scope Of Coverage,” namely: 1) is there an actual…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Berg v. HudesmanWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Queen City Farms, Inc. v. Central Nat'l Ins. Co. of OmahaWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Hearst Communications v. Seattle Times Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Hearst Communications, Inc. v. Seattle Times Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Hollis v. Garwall, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1999

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Davis v. AlthauserDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2023
  2. Jones v. HurleyDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API