Legal Opinion

GTE Mobilnet of California Limited Partnership v. Town of Danville

District Court, N.D. California

Decided January 14, 2020No. 3:19-cv-01886Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 GTE MOBILNET OF CALIFORNIA Case No. 19-cv-01886-JCS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S 9 MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY v. JUDGMENT ON THE FIRST CLAIM 10 OF THE COMPLAINT TOWN OF DANVILLE, 11 Re: Dkt. No. 28 Defendant. 12 13 Plaintiff GTE Mobilnet of California, L.P., d/b/a Verizon Wireless (“Plaintiff” or 14 “Verizon”) filed its motion for a partial summary judgment on the first claim of its complaint, 15 which alleged that Defendant Town of Danville’s (“Defendant” or “Town”) denial of Verizon’s…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. United States v. Carlo Bianchi & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Cellular Telephone Company, Doing Business as at & T Wireless Services v. The Town of Oyster Bay and the Town Board of the Town of Oyster BayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API