Legal Opinion

Farmers Union Central Exchange v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided June 27, 1978No. 76-2138PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the Court filed by McGOWAN, Circuit Judge.

McGOWAN, Circuit Judge:

Petitioners, a group of oil shippers, challenge an order of the Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC) sustaining (1) increased rates filed by intervenor Williams Pipe Line Co. (Williams) and (2) joint rates initiated by Williams and intervenor Explorer Pipeline Co. (Explorer), as against claims that the former are unreasonably excessive, see 49 U.S.C. § l(5)(a), and the latter are discriminatory, see id § 2, and illegally preferential, see id. § 3(1).

This review proceeding is unique in that, while pending before us…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Permian Basin Area Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Smyth v. AmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  4. Smyth v. Ames; Smyth v. Smith; Smyth v. HigginsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  5. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1911

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Harborlite Corporation v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Southern Pacific Transportation Co., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
  2. Cook Inlet Pipe Line Co. v. Alaska Public Utilities CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Farmers Union Central Exchange v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1982
  4. Farmers Union Central Exchange v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
  5. Farmers Union Central Exchange, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, and United States of America, Williams Pipe Line Company, Association of Oil Pipelines, Getty Pipeline, Inc., Marathon Pipe Line Company, Phillips Pipe Line Company, Sun Pipe Line Company, Mid-America Pipeline Company, Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation, Arco Pipe Line Company, Intervenors. Association of Oil Pipe Lines and Williams Pipe Line Company v. United States of America and Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Marathon Pipe Line Company, Farmers Union Central Exchange, Inc., Mid-America Pipeline Company, Buckeye Pipe Line Company, Texas Eastern Transmission Corp., Hydrocarbon Transportation, Inc., Belle Fourche Pipe Line Company, Getty Pipeline, Inc., Sun Pipe Line Company, Arco Pipe Line Company, Intervenors. Phillips Pipe Line Company v. United States of America and Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Farmers Union Central Exchange, Inc., Getty Pipeline, Inc., Sun Pipe Line Company, Mid-America Pipeline Company, Arco Pipe Line Company, Intervenors. Sun Pipe Line Company v. United States of America and Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Farmers Union Central Exchange, Inc., Getty Pipeline, Inc., Sun Pipe Line Company, Mid-America Pipeline Company, Arco Pipe Line Company, Intervenors. Arco Pipe Line Company v. United States of America and Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Farmers Union Central Exchange, Inc., Belle Fourche Pipe Line Co., Getty Pipeline, Inc., Sun Pipe Line Company, Mid-America Pipeline Company, Intervenors. Mid-America Pipeline Company v. United States of America and Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Farmers Union Central Exchange, Inc., Belle Fourche Pipe Line Co., Getty Pipeline, Inc., Sun Pipe Line Company, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API