Legal Opinion

State v. Warren

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided October 7, 2008PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGorman, J.

[¶ 1] The State appeals an order of the Superior Court (Aroostook County, Hunter, J.) granting Daniel P. Warren’s motion to suppress evidence. Warren was charged with one count of criminal OUI (Class D), 29-A M.R.S. § 2411(1-A)(C)(1) (2007). The State argues that the court erred in: (1) suppressing evidence that Warren did not challenge at the time of the hearing; (2) finding that Warren did not voluntarily respond to an officer’s questions; (3) determining that an officer must have probable cause of an operating under the influence (OUI) offense, rather than a reasonable suspicion based on…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. State v. PinkhamSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989
  3. State v. GulickSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
  4. State v. LittleSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
  5. State v. BarczakSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. CasillasNebraska Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. KoehlerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012
  3. Howitt v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
  4. Howitt v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API