Rabinak v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters Pension Fund
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge.
When William Rabinak retired and received the calculation of his pension benefit, he thought something was off. The annual salaries listed did not appear to take into account quarterly payments of $2,500 he received for serving on his organization’s Executive Board, so he appealed and maintained those payments should have been counted. The pension fund appeals committee denied his appeal. Controlled as we are by a standard of review that asks only whether the decision was arbitrary and capricious, we affirm the denial. The plan’s definition of compensation includes…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Arthur Oates v. Discovery Zone, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Gallo v. Amoco Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Holmstrom v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- McGaugh v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
- Estate of Michael Gifford v. Operating Engineers 139 Health Benefit FundCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2025
- Aviation West Charters, LLC v. Health and Welfare Plan for Employees of Ajinomoto USA, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019
- Berceanu, Luciana v. UMR, Inc.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2023
- Canter v. AT&T Midwest Disability Benefits ProgramDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2021
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.