Legal Opinion

Smith v. Industrial Commission

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1950No. 5269PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STANFORD, Justice.

It is the claim of petitioner that on the 6th day of April, 1946, she was hurt in an accident arising out of and in the course of her employment while working for Tom M. Bunn and T. Yuki, doing business as Salinas Valley Vegetable Exchange, by being hit or struck on the wrist of the right (or major) hand while employed as a lettuce trimmer. The said employers were insured against liability by the Industrial Commission of Arizona.

After three surgical operations performed on the dates of August 20, 1946, November 8, 1946 and July 21, 1948, the petitioner drew compensation for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hoffman v. BrophyArizona Supreme Court · 1944

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Boggs v. D & L CONSTRUCTION COMPANYNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Gomez v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZONAArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Holt v. West Kentucky Coal CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1961
  4. Weiss v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Gomez v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API