Legal Opinion
Niblack v. Seaberg Hotel Co.
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided February 28, 1938No. 4340PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRICE, Justice.
The principal questions are: (1) Whether the deed of trust sought to be foreclosed is void; and (2), if valid, whether plaintiffs (appellees here) were proper parties plaintiff, and .therefore authorized to foreclose such deed of trust in this action. The facts are:
On the 15th day of December, 1919, defendant Hugo Seaberg executed 140 coupon bonds of that date, of the par value of $500 each, payable to bearer: The defendant the Seaberg Hotel Company, a New Mexico corporation, secured said bonds by executing and delivering a deed of trust of even date therewith, to the Chicago…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Connolly v. Union Sewer Pipe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
- President of the Bank of the United States v. OwensSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
- Harris v. RunnelsSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
- Miller v. AmmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Burck v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Farrar v. HoodNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1952
- Forrest Currell Lumber Company v. ThomasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970
- Riblet Tramway Company, Incorporated v. Monte Verde Corporation, and Angel Fire Ski CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
- Alexander Film Co. v. PierceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1942
- Walter E. Heller & Co. of California v. StephensNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.