Legal Opinion
Seaboard Air Line Ry. Co. v. Glenn
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided May 28, 1925No. 7 Div. 555PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.
The cbmplaint is for recovery of damages “for an assault and battery committed on the plaintiff by J. H. Payne, a servant or agent of the defendant, while acting within the line and scope of his employment, on, to wit, December 5, 1921,” describing the injuries sustained. This is the Code form adapted to the ease in hand. Civil Code 1923, vol.'4, p. 505, form 18.
The questions presented on this appeal arise upon the refusal of certain affirmative instructions for defendant. The assault and battery was not denied. Was it within the line and scope of the employment? Payne was station agent of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Austin v. BeanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
- Republic Iron & Steel Co. v. SelfSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
- Hardeman v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
- Jebeles-Colias Conf. Co. v. BoozeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
- Goodloe v. Memphis & Charleston RailroadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- The B. F. Goodrich Tire Company v. E. H. LysterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
- Lange v. National Biscuit CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Plaisance v. YelderCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1981
- St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Mercury Freight Lines, Inc. v. PharoSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.