St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. Robbins
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
The suit for personal injury was against the master and its servant acting for it at the time of the injury. The verdict and judgment were such as there was no ap plication of the rule of Walker v. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co., 214 Ala. 492, 108 So. 388, as the judgment was against the agent and principal, and the railroad company is the sole appellant, on a summons and severance as to the other defendant, Benton.
It is conceded that whether Benton was negligent in the operation of the car was for the jury, but appellant contends that upon the undisputed evidence it is, as a matter of law,…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- McMillan v. AikenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. MillonasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
- Jones v. BellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- Republic Iron & Steel Co. v. SelfSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
- Hardeman v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Alabama Fuel & Iron Co. v. PowaskiSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
- Koonce v. CraftSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- Avco Corporation v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
- Luquire Ins. Co. v. McCallaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
- Jewel Tea Co. v. SklivisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.