Legal Opinion

Hessell v. Johnson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 11, 1886PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Delta. (Grant, J.) Debt. Defendants bring error. The facts are. stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Campbell, O. J.

Defendants were sued jointly upon an-attachment bond given for the release of attached property belonging to defendant Johnson, who signed the bond as principal, the others being charged as sureties.

It appeared on the trial that Royce signed the bond on the-express understanding, which, in our opinion, was equivalent, to a condition, that it should be signed also by one John K. Stack as co-surety, and that he had reason to believe this-would be done. This condition was mad.e to Johhson, the-principal, and, as he claimed and swore, was made known to-plaintiffs’ attorney before…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hall v. ParkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Johnston v. Township of KimballMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Brown v. Judge of ProbateMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Brand v. JohnroweMichigan Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. County of King v. FerryWashington Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Hendry v. CartwrightNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Cass County v. American Exchange State BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1902
  4. People ex rel. National Sewer-Pipe Co. v. SharpMichigan Supreme Court · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API