Hessell v. Johnson
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Delta. (Grant, J.) Debt. Defendants bring error. The facts are. stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Campbell, O. J.
Defendants were sued jointly upon an-attachment bond given for the release of attached property belonging to defendant Johnson, who signed the bond as principal, the others being charged as sureties.
It appeared on the trial that Royce signed the bond on the-express understanding, which, in our opinion, was equivalent, to a condition, that it should be signed also by one John K. Stack as co-surety, and that he had reason to believe this-would be done. This condition was mad.e to Johhson, the-principal, and, as he claimed and swore, was made known to-plaintiffs’ attorney before…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hall v. ParkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
- Johnston v. Township of KimballMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
- Brown v. Judge of ProbateMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
- Brand v. JohnroweMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
3Cited by4 opinions
- County of King v. FerryWashington Supreme Court · 1893
- Hendry v. CartwrightNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1907
- Cass County v. American Exchange State BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1902
- People ex rel. National Sewer-Pipe Co. v. SharpMichigan Supreme Court · 1903