Legal Opinion

RAM I LLC v. New York State Division of Housing & Community Renewal

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 15, 2015PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The appeal should be dismissed, without costs, as moot.

The tenant having vacated the rent-controlled apartment at issue, pursuant to a stipulation of settlement with petitioner, this appeal has been rendered moot (see Matter of Grand Jury Subpoenas for Locals 17, 135, 257 & 608 of United Bhd. of Carpenters & Joiners of Am., AFL-CIO, 72 NY2d 307, 311 [1988]; Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707 [1980]). The exception to the mootness doctrine is not applicable here (see Wisholek v Douglas, 97 NY2d 740, 742 [2002]).

Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Pigott,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hearst Corp. v. ClyneNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. In re Grand Jury Subpoenas for Local 17, 135, 257 & 608 of United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Wisholek v. DouglasNew York Court of Appeals · 2002

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Matter of Tribeca Equity Partners, L.P. v. New York State Div. of Hous. & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API