RAM I LLC v. New York State Division of Housing & Community Renewal
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The appeal should be dismissed, without costs, as moot.
The tenant having vacated the rent-controlled apartment at issue, pursuant to a stipulation of settlement with petitioner, this appeal has been rendered moot (see Matter of Grand Jury Subpoenas for Locals 17, 135, 257 & 608 of United Bhd. of Carpenters & Joiners of Am., AFL-CIO, 72 NY2d 307, 311 [1988]; Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707 [1980]). The exception to the mootness doctrine is not applicable here (see Wisholek v Douglas, 97 NY2d 740, 742 [2002]).
Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Pigott,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hearst Corp. v. ClyneNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- In re Grand Jury Subpoenas for Local 17, 135, 257 & 608 of United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Wisholek v. DouglasNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
3Cited by1 opinion
- Matter of Tribeca Equity Partners, L.P. v. New York State Div. of Hous. & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016