Legal Opinion

Wisholek v. Douglas

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 21, 2002PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, without costs, and the matter remitted to Supreme Court, with directions to dismiss the action as against The Health Care Plan, Inc., solely upon the ground that the issue as presented in this case is moot.

This appeal arises from a medical malpractice action commenced by plaintiff and her husband against Dr. Gary Douglas and his employer, The Health Care Plan, Inc. (HCP) — a qualified health maintenance organization. HCP moved to dismiss plaintiffs’ claims, arguing that Public Health Law § 4410 (1)…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hearst Corp. v. ClyneNew York Court of Appeals · 1980

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Saratoga County Chamber of Commerce, Inc. v. PatakiNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Funderburke v. New York State Department of Civil ServiceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  3. Avella v. BattAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  4. Kalish v. LindsayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  5. Briggs v. HalloranAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API