Legal Opinion

State v. Scott

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 27, 2009No. 36846-3-IIPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

207 P.3d 495 (2009)

STATE of Washington, Respondent,

v.

Richard Roy SCOTT, Appellant.

No. 36846-3-II.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.

May 27, 2009.

Dana M. Lind, Nielsen Broman & Koch PLLC, Seattle, WA, for Appellant.

David John Burke, Attorney at Law, South Bend, WA, for Respondent.

HUNT, J.

¶ 1 Richard Roy Scott appeals the superior court's denial of his motion to withdraw his third-degree child-rape Alford[1] plea. He argues that the court erred (1) in denying his motion as untimely; and (2) in failing to conduct an evidentiary hearing to determine the credibility of recent recantations…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. State v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  4. State v. NewtonWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  5. State v. AtenWashington Supreme Court · 1996

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. MacDonaldWashington Supreme Court · 2015
  2. State v. LarsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  3. State v. StatlerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  4. State v. GassmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  5. State v. GassmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API