State v. Gassman

¶1 Tyler W. Gassman appeals his convictions for first degree robbery while armed with a deadly weapon, two counts of first degree assault while armed with a deadly weapon, and two counts of drive-by shooting. He contends the trial court erred by denying his request for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence. The State cross-appeals, contending the court erred in imposing a mitigated exceptional sentence. In his statement of additional grounds for review (SAG), Mr. Gassman contends his convictions violate double jeopardy and the trial court erred in granting the State’s motion to amend…