Legal Opinion

State v. LLOYD A. FRY ROOFING COMPANY

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 1972PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, C.J.

Defendant was convicted for the violation of ORS 449.990(9), which makes the violation of the rules of the Columhia-Willamette Air Pollution Authority a misdemeanor. The Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment of conviction (9 Or App 189, 495 P2d 751) whereupon defendant filed a petition for review. We allowed the petition, limiting the argument to one assignment of error relating to the interpretation of ORS 2.570(4), which reads as follows:

“(4) The Chief Judge shall apportion the business of the court between the departments. Each department shall have power to hear and determine causes, and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. LLOYD A. FRY ROOFING COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hagelstein v. Swift-Eckrich Division of ConAgraNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Lloyd A. Fry Roofing Co. v. Pollution Control BoardAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
  3. State v. AchzigerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
  4. State v. Lloyd A. Fry Roofing Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API