Legal Opinion
In re James B.
New York City Family Court
Decided January 4, 1990PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Judith Sheindlin, J.
In a juvenile delinquency proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3 the presentment agency (petitioner) seeks a pretrial ruling, limiting the cross-examination of an eyewitness.
*533The respondent is accused of acts which if committed by an adult would constitute the crimes of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal facilitation in the fourth degree. It is alleged that respondent was aiding another in the illegal sale of narcotics to a civilian. Said activity was observed by police from an apartment inside a housing…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- McCray v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Alford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re Chris C.New York City Family Court · 1997